Matter of Burton

The Respondent, Michael D. Burton, was charged in a two count complaint for disciplinary action with failing to provide competent representation, failing to act with diligence, failing to keep his clients informed, and engaging in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice, in violation of Rules 1.1, 1.3, 1.4 and 8.4(d) of the Rules of Professional Conduct for Attor-meys at Law. Thereafter, the Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission and Respondent entered into and tendered for this Court's approval a Statement of Cireum-stances and Conditional Agreement for Discipline pursuant to…