Legal Opinion

Leibovitch v. Islamic Republic of Iran

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided May 19, 2016No. 08 C 1939PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Rubén Castillo, United States District Court

In this long-running case, Shlomo Leibo-vitch and several of his family members (“Plaintiffs”) seek to recover for injuries they suffered as a result of an act of terrorism committed in Israel with the support of the Islamic Republic of Iran and the Iranian Ministry of Information (“Defendants”). Presently before the Court are motions to quash filed by non-parties Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd. (“Bank of Tokyo”) and BNP Paribas (“Paribas”) (collectively, “the banks”), as well as Plaintiffs’ post-judgment motions to…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  4. Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Walden v. FioreSupreme Court of the United States · 2014

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Nike, Inc. v. WuDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  2. Siegel v. HSBC Holdings, PLCDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 2017
  3. Leibovitch v. Islamic Republic IranDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
  4. America's Health & Resource Center, Ltd. v. Promologics, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
  5. America's Health & Resource Center, Ltd. v. Promologics, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API