Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Staacke

California Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1900No. S. F. No. 2301PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco settling an executor’s account. J. V. Coffey, Judge. The facts are stated in. the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.

Thomas Bell died testate in the city and county of San Francisco. Subsequent to the issuance of letters testamentary, and prior to the return of the inventory and appraisement, the court made an order for a family allowance of two thousand dollars per month, this allowance to continue until the further order of the court. The administration of the estate proceeded on its course, and nearly three years later two creditors filed a petition asking that the order for a family allowance previously made be modified. Theresa Bell, the widow of Thomas Bell, deceased, contested the application, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Burris v. KennedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Ruggles v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Leach v. PierceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Estate of NolanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. In Re Foreman's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Salter v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API