Legal Opinion
Harmon v. Harmon
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 29, 1960No. Civ. 24305PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtValles, J.
This is a companion ease to Harmon v. Harmon, ante, p. 245, 2d Civ. No. 24322.
In a proceeding under the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act an order was made on May 17, 1956, directing defendant to pay specified amounts for the support of his minor child. On appeal the order was affirmed. On the going down of the remittitur defendant moved the court for an order dismissing the proceeding. The motion was denied. That order is the subject of the appeal in the companion case, 2d Civ. No. 24322.
After the reporter’s transcript in the latter appeal had been prepared, defendant requested…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sjoberg v. HastorfCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Imperial Beverage Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- People v. GrossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Garten v. GartenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Cross v. TustinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Frustuck v. City of FairfaxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Agnew v. Contractors Safety Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1963
- Harmon v. HarmonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960