Legal Opinion

Hart v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 12, 1981No. 575PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRICE, Judge:

This appeal arises from the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County denying a petition to compel arbitration under an uninsured motorist provision of an automobile insurance policy. The narrow issue for our consideration is in what forum the question of uninsured motorist coverage should be determined—whether before an arbitrator or in the Court of Common Pleas.

The pertinent facts are as follows. On January 11, 1975, Hugh Hart, Jr., sustained fatal injuries while a passenger in an automobile that was involved in an accident. Five other individuals were also…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United Services Automobile Ass'n AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Runewicz v. Keystone InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. National Grange Mutual Insurance v. KuhnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. Harwitz v. Selas Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  5. Allstate Insurance v. McMonagleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. White v. Concord Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Hade v. Nationwide InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Gaslin, Inc. v. L.G.C. Exports, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Gentile v. WeissSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Nagle v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API