Legal Opinion

Gentile v. Weiss

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 15, 1984No. 251 and 439PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

Once again this Court has been called upon to acknowledge and then proceed according to the distinction between statutory and common law arbitration to determine the power of a court to modify an award because of alleged errors of law.

Antonio Gentile, appellee, contracted with Selwyn Weiss, appellant, to rehabilitate and convert Weiss’ vacant building into apartments. A year later, Weiss exercised the termination provisions of the contract and discontinued Gentile’s employment as general contractor. Gentile thereupon commenced an action in the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Runewicz v. Keystone InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Schreiber v. Republic Intermodal Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. White v. Concord Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Eckrich v. DiNardoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Commonwealth v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Pirches v. General Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Snyder v. CressSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Arthur J. Lacourse, on Behalf of the Estate of Peter Lacourse, Deceased v. Firemen's Insurance Company of Newark, New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  4. Hade v. Nationwide InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Gaslin, Inc. v. L.G.C. Exports, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API