Legal Opinion

Hade v. Nationwide Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 28, 1986No. 01138PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CIRILLO, Judge:

This is an appeal from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County denying a petition to vacate or modify an arbitration panel’s award. We affirm.

The appellant insurance company issued an automobile policy to appellee. By the terms of the contract, disputes over policy coverage arising between the parties can be submitted to arbitration. Concerning the situs of such arbitration, the policy states that “unless the insured and company agree otherwise, arbitration will take place in the county and state in which the insured lives.” Appellee resides in Montgomery…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. National Grange Mutual Insurance v. KuhnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. Allstate Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  3. White v. Concord Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Sharon Steel Corporation v. Jewell Coal and Coke CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
  5. Greenspan v. United Services Automobile Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Brennan v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Ostroff v. Keystone InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Ginther v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Hade v. Nationwide InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Shapiro v. Keystone InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API