Sobel v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtGeeen, Judge
The plaintiff brings this action to recover for alleged breaches of a contract made for the construction of several hangars and work in connection therewith at Langley Field, Virginia. The material parts of the contract are set out in Finding 2.
The contract provided that the defendant was to furnish the contractor part of the materials and plaintiff the remainder. The plaintiff claims that he was led to believe by the plans, specifications and statements made by the construction quartermaster that a railroad track would be constructed parallel with and adjacent to the proposed location for…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Rust Engineering Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1938
- Levering & Garrigues Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932
- H. E. Crook Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1924
3Cited by9 opinions
- George A. Fuller Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1947
- Hirsch v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1941
- Stapleton Construction Co. ex rel. Thos. G. Sperling & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1940
- Silas Mason Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1940
- B-W Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1945
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.