Legal Opinion

Silas Mason Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 8, 1940No. 44659PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGkeeN, Judge

The petition sets out thirty-one separate causes of action and defendant demurs severally to each thereof. Among, other things, the petition alleges in general that the plaintiffs entered into a contract with the defendant to construct a dam in accordance with specifications and supplemental-notices made part of the contract. The contract price was stated to be $29,339,301.50. On September 25, 1934, the plaintiffs received notice from the contracting officer of the defendant to proceed with the work provided in the contract. The contract provided that change orders might be made by the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Plumley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Phoenix Bridge Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1937
  3. Plato v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1938
  4. Fitzgibbon v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1917
  5. Sobel v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1938

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Penker Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1942
  2. Cosmopolitan Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
  3. Tobin Quarries, Inc. v. Central Nebraska Public Power & Irrigation Dist.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1946
  4. Cosmopolitan Manufacturing Co. v. The United States. Arlene Coats, a Partnership Consisting of Sidney Berkenfeld and Benjamin Prepon v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
  5. Blair ex rel. Roanoke Marble & Granite Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API