Legal Opinion

H. E. Crook Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 3, 1924No. B-195PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*350MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT

The facts in this case are fully set out in the findings, and it is not necessary to recapitulate them here. The plaintiff commenced work under the contract, and was delayed 412 days by the defendant in its performance. It thereby incurred losses and expenses amounting to the sum of $11,894.07. These facts are not disputed.

The law governing- such cases is well established, and has been repeatedly asserted by this court and by the Supreme Court of the United States. Kelly & Kelly v. United States, 31 C. Cls. 361; William Cramp & Sons v. United States, 41 C. Cls. 164;…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. United States v. MuellerSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Kelly v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1896

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. McCloskey ex rel. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1928
  2. Phoenix Bridge Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1937
  3. Levering & Garrigues Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932
  4. Levering & Garrigues Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1931
  5. Hirsch v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API