Legal Opinion
Davis v. Sams
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 12, 1975No. 47094PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HODGES, Vice Chief Justice.
This is an appeal by Nathan Sams, Individually and d/b/a Sams Flying Service (Sams) from the refusal of the trial court to grant a mistrial and denial of a motion for new trial. Sams urges four allegations of error on appeal. Two of the allegations of error were not raised in the motion for new trial, and therefore, will not be considered on appeal. We held in Poteete v. MFA Insurance Co., 527 P.2d 18, 22 (Okl.1974):
“Although a motion for new trial is no longer a condition precedent to the perfecting of an appeal, if a motion for new trial is filed, and a new trial…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Garvin v. HarrellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Poteete v. MFA Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
- Fitts v. Standard Life & Accident Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
- Taylor v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1928
- Barnhart v. International Harvester CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Middlebrook v. Imler, Tenny & Kugler, M.D.'s, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Faulkenberry v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
- Born v. EisenmanNevada Supreme Court · 1998
- NYE v. BNSF RAILWAY CO.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
- Robinson v. Borg-Warner Protective Services Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.