Legal Opinion

Born v. Eisenman

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided September 1, 1998No. 29303PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Two surgeries were performed on appellant Sharon Born in January 1986. The first was a hysterectomy performed by respondent Dr. Eugene Eisenman during which complications developed because the right ureter had been ligated. The second surgery was performed by both Dr. Eisenman and respondent Dr. Sheldon Freedman to repair the ligated ureter. Born continued to experience pain in her abdomen and exploratory abdominal surgery was performed more than two years later. The surgeon who performed the exploratory surgery testified that he discovered that Born’s small intestine was almost…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. EgtedarNevada Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Edwards v. QuackenbushSupreme Court of Colorado · 1944
  3. Davis v. SamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975

4Cited by13 opinions

  1. Banks Ex Rel. Banks v. Sunrise Hosp.Nevada Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Szydel v. MarkmanNevada Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Dolorfino v. Univ. Med. Ctr. of S. Nev.Nevada Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Banks Ex Rel. Banks v. Sunrise Hosp.Nevada Supreme Court · 2004
  5. DOLORFINO VS. UNIV. MED. CTR. OF S. NEVADANevada Supreme Court · 2018

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API