Legal Opinion

Faulkenberry v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 15, 1983No. 55005PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPALA, Justice:

In this action under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act [FELA] the issues presented on appeal are: [1] Was there prejudicial error in failing to instruct the jury that damages for lost future wages are not subject to income tax liability? [2] Did the trial court err in failing to sustain Railroad’s demurrer to the evidence? [3] Did the trial court’s refusal to bifurcate the proceedings constitute reversible error? and [4] Was there prejudicial error in a ruling that restricted the scope of cross-examination? We answer all four questions in the negative.

The action under review…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Michigan Central Railroad v. VreelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Gulf Offshore Co. v. Mobil Oil Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. LiepeltSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Faulkenberry v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  5. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Horizons, Inc. v. Keo Leasing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  2. Reeves v. AgeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  3. Smicklas v. SpitzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  4. Keizor v. Sand Springs Railway Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1993
  5. Crussel v. KirkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API