Legal Opinion

Hankins v. . Hankins

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 9, 1932PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBkogdbN, J.

When the plaintiff instituted her action against the defendants for damages, both compensatory and vindictive, alleging that the affections of her husband had been alienated, the law imposed upon her the duty of showing, by proper evidence, the following facts: (1) that she and her husband were happily married, and that a genuine love and affection'existed between them; (2) that the love and affection so existing was alienated and destroyed; (3) that the wrongful and malicious acts of defendant produced and brought about the loss and alienation of such love and affection. Brown v. Brown, 124…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. . BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. Brown v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  3. Cottle v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  4. Hyatt v. . McCoySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  5. Powell v. . BenthallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Worth v. WorthWyoming Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Johnston v. . JohnstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  3. Barker v. DowdySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  4. Bishop v. GlazenerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  5. Cannon v. MillerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API