Legal Opinion

Worth v. Worth

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1935No. 1881PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blume, Justice.

This is an action for alienation of affection by a daughter-in-law against her parents-in-law. The plaintiff is the wife of Harold Worth, son of G. M. Worth and Kate Worth, defendants herein. Plaintiff sued to recover the sum of $35,000 from the defendants. The case was tried to a jury, who returned a verdict for plaintiff in the sum of $10,000. Judgment was entered for that amount, and the defendants have appealed. A few brief facts, to elucidate the opinion herein, are as follows:

The defendants, parents of Harold, had a ranch south of Wheatland. Plaintiff, then 22 years of…

2Cases cited84 opinions

  1. Watkins v. Prudential InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. State v. GreenUtah Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Marbury Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1899
  4. Woodhouse v. Woodhouse Et Ux.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1925
  5. Cogdell v. Wilmington & Weldon RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Koch v. ElkinsIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Department of Finance v. Union Pacific RailroadIdaho Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Goldberg v. MusimSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
  4. MacDonald v. OganIdaho Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Kamp v. KampWyoming Supreme Court · 1982

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API