Legal Opinion

Hyatt v. . McCoy

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 21, 1927PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff brought suit to recover damages for the seduction of his wife and the alienation of her affections. The jury returned the following verdict:

1. Did the defendant, W.L. McCoy, alienate the affections of plaintiff's wife, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes.

2. Did the defendant, W.L. McCoy, have immoral relations with the plaintiff's wife, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes.

3. What amount of actual damages, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to recover? Answer: $10,000.

4. What amount of punitive damages, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to recover? Answer: $2,000.

Judgment…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Sprinkle v. Wellborn.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. Brown v. . Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  3. Benton v. . CollinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  4. Shields v. . WhitakerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
  5. Phillips v. Postal Telegraph Cable Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. . NewsomeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  2. Cole v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  3. Hoke v. Atlantic Greyhound Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  4. Sebastian v. KluttzCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  5. Caudle v. SwansonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API