Legal Opinion
Stern v. Hillman
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 23, 1931No. Docket No. 7564PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRAY, J., pro tem.
On July 23d, respondents served and filed a memorandum, required by rule I of the Rules of the Superior Court, adopted by the Judicial Council, to set the above action at law for trial. The county clerk on August 16th notified both parties in writing that the case was on the “Civil Trial List”, and would be called in the department of the presiding judge on August 22, at 2 P. M., at which time the parties were instructed to be present as the date of trial would be then fixed. Appellants, on August 20th served and filed a written demand for a trial by jury. The court on…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Farrell v. City of OntarioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- In Re Estate of BairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Reiner v. SchroederCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Mathews v. HornbeckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- In re Estate of RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Cloud v. Market Street Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1946
- Glogau v. HaganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- MacFarlane v. FarwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Hill v. PeresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Cowlin v. PringleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.