Legal Opinion

Montanaro v. Pandolfini

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 21, 1961PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMurphy, J.

The plaintiff brought this action for specific performance to compel the defendant to carry out the terms of a written agreement to sell to the plaintiff a ten-family house on Albany Avenue, Hartford, which the defendant owned. The plaintiff also sought damages. The defendant demurred to the complaint on the ground that the agreement did not comply with the requirements of the Statute of Frauds and, more specifically, that the terms of the purchase money mortgage provided for in the agreement were uncertain and indefinite. The trial court overruled the demurrer. Thereupon the defendant filed…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Nichols v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1834
  2. Rutt v. RocheSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
  3. Gendelman v. MongilloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
  4. Handy v. BarclaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
  5. Garre v. GerykSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Breen v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  2. Hoffman v. SV Co., Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Botticello v. StefanoviczSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  4. DeLuca v. C. W. Blakeslee & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  5. Heyman v. CBS, INC.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1979

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API