Gunn Hardware Co. v. Denison
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to superior court of Grand Eapids. (Burlingame, J.) Attachment suit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, C. J.
On November 4, 1889, the plaintiff commenced suit against the defendant by attachment. The plaintiff's demand consisted of two items. The first item was the balance then due from defendant to plaintiff upon an open account amounting to $196.23. The second item was a promissory note dated April 26, 1889, payable January 10, 1890, for $316.16. Two affidavits were made as the foundation of the attachment proceedings,—one, in the ordinary form required by section 7987 of Howell's Statutes, stating that $196.23 was then due upon express contract; the other was an affidavit framed under the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Taylor v. AdamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
- Wasey v. MahoneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dunlap v. ByersMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
- Hannah & Lay Mercantile Co. v. MosserMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Hempel v. Bay Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
- John D. Gruber Co. v. Montcalm Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Daines v. TarabusiMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.