Legal Opinion
Young v. Reeves & Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided October 7, 1912No. Docket No. 105PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Appeal from Van Burén; Des Voignes, J. Bill by William H. Young and another against Reeves & Company, a foreign corporation, for the cancellation of certain notes and mortgages. From an order overruling a demurrer to complainant’s bill, defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, C. J.
The complainant filed a bill stating, in substance, as follows:
“ Humbly complaining, your orator, William H. Young, respectfully represents unto the court that he is a resident of the township of Hamilton, county of Van Burén, and State of Michigan, and of the age of 21 years and upwards; that on or about the 23d day of February, A. D. 1909, he was approached by one H. D. Bullen, a salesman representing Reeves & Co., a corporation organized, existing, and doing business at Columbus, in the State of Indiana, with a branch office doing business by permission of law and by license at the city of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fred Macey Co. v. MaceyMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
- John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. DickMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Roberts v. SholesMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
- Kimmerle v. Dowagiac Gas Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1909
3Cited by4 opinions
- Genack v. GormanMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
- Matthews v. Montreal Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Daines v. TarabusiMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
- Young v. Reeves & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912