Auto-Owners Insurance Co. v. Great West Casualty
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DIETZEN, Judge.
In this no-fault insurance benefits proceeding, appellant challenges the district court’s decision awarding summary judgment to respondent. The district court concluded that the insured’s injury arose out of the “maintenance or use” of an automobile-transport trailer insured by appellant, and not out of the “maintenance or use” of a stalled vehicle insured by respondent, which was loaded on top of the trailer. Because we conclude that the injury arose out of the “maintenance or use” of the stalled vehicle, and not the trailer, we reverse and remand.
FACTS
On February 9,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Hubred v. Control Data Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Continental Western Insurance Co. v. KlugSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Holm v. Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. MarvinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006