Legal Opinion

Jessen v. National Excess Insurance

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1989No. 17197PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANSOM, Justice.

Seeking compensatory and punitive damages, Larry Jessen and Michael McCoun sued National Excess Insurance Company (National) for breach of contract and bad faith failure to pay a first-party claim. The jury returned a verdict in favor of Jessen and McCoun, awarding $25,000 compensatory and $75,000 punitive damages against National. The trial court awarded attorney fees and costs to Jessen and McCoun. National appeals. We affirm.

Jessen and McCoun first were covered as insureds by National when they rented a Cessna 310 airplane in February 1985. To be covered under the…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Egan v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Wangen v. Ford Motor Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. ArmstrongIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Bankers Life & Casualty Co. v. CrenshawSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Bankers Life & Cas. Co. v. CrenshawMississippi Supreme Court · 1985

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. Suzuki Motor Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1996
  2. Paiz v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Romero v. Mervyn'sNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Sloan v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Jackson National Life Insurance v. RececoniNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API