Legal Opinion

Bankers Life & Casualty Co. v. Crenshaw

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 16, 1988No. 85-1765PublishedCited by 221 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*73. Justice Marshall

delivered the opinion of the Court.

In this case we must decide whether a Mississippi statute imposing a 15% penalty on parties who appeal unsuccessfully from a money judgment violates the Equal Protection Clause.

I

This action grows out of allegations that appellant Bankers Life and Casualty Company refused in bad faith to pay appel-lee Lloyd Crenshaw’s insurance claim for loss of a limb. According to testimony at trial, appellee was injured on January 6, 1979, when a car alternator he was repairing rolled off his workbench and landed on his foot. Three days later, after the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Taylor v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by221 opinions

  1. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Browning-Ferris Industries of Vermont, Inc. v. Kelco Disposal, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Yee v. City of EscondidoSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. TXO Production Corp. v. Alliance Resources Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

216 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API