Legal Opinion

Paiz v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1994No. 20446PublishedCited by 99 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MONTGOMERY, Chief Justice.

Ronald and Bernadine Paiz (“the Paizes” or “Plaintiffs”) sued State Farm Fire and Casualty Company and Robert Ellsworth, the agent through whom they purchased a policy of hazard insurance from State Farm (“Defendants”), on several claims arising from State Farm’s denial of payment for damage to a building destroyed by fire. The Paizes won a jury verdict of $380,000 in compensatory damages against both Defendants and $485,000 in punitive damages against State Farm. The trial court entered judgment on the verdict, awarding Plaintiffs the damages assessed by the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Scott v. RizzoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Tuttle v. RaymondSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
  3. Linthicum v. Nationwide Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Loucks v. Albuquerque National BankNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Continental Potash, Inc. v. Freeport-McMoran, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1993

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by99 opinions

  1. Smith v. Ingersoll-Rand, Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  2. Azar v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Allsup's Convenience Stores, Inc. v. North River InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Fuerschbach v. Southwest Airlines Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  5. Sloan v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2004

94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API