Legal Opinion

Obersteiner v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 31, 1989No. 1 CA-IC 88-138PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEVI RAY HAIRE, Judge,

Retired.

This is a special action review of an Industrial Commission award for temporary disability benefits. Because we find that the administrative law judge erred by imposing the requirements of Rule 41 (A.A.C. R4-13-141) on the claimant’s request for cross-examination, we set aside the award and do not reach other issues raised on review.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On May 20, 1987, the petitioner employee (claimant) sustained an industrial injury while employed by the respondent employer, E.T. Auto & Truck. The claim was accepted for benefits by the respondent carrier, Sentry…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stephens v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  2. Ross v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Jones v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  4. Scheytt v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZ.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  5. Norsworthy v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Volk v. BrameCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  2. Artis v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  3. Coulter v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  4. Rico v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  5. Flores v. Cooper Tire and Rubber Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API