Legal Opinion

Scheytt v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZ.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 31, 1982No. 1 CA-IC 2644PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HAIRE, Judge.

The dispositive issue in this review of a workman’s compensation award is the petitioning employee’s contention that the administrative law judge committed error in refusing to give her the opportunity to cross-examine two medical experts whose report constituted a substantial part of the basis for the judge’s award.

Pursuant to the request of the petitioning employee (claimant), a hearing had been scheduled to determine whether claimant had sustained a compensable injury. Claimant’s theory was that she had suffered a gradual injury resulting from the repetitive stressful…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jones v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  2. Books v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Nye v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  4. Linn v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  5. Pauley v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Moore v. American Coal Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1987
  2. A.J. Bayless Markets, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  3. Obersteiner v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
  4. Tyree v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
  5. Div. of Finance v. Industrial Com'nCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API