Scheytt v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZ.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HAIRE, Judge.
The dispositive issue in this review of a workman’s compensation award is the petitioning employee’s contention that the administrative law judge committed error in refusing to give her the opportunity to cross-examine two medical experts whose report constituted a substantial part of the basis for the judge’s award.
Pursuant to the request of the petitioning employee (claimant), a hearing had been scheduled to determine whether claimant had sustained a compensable injury. Claimant’s theory was that she had suffered a gradual injury resulting from the repetitive stressful…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jones v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
- Books v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1962
- Nye v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
- Linn v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
- Pauley v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Moore v. American Coal Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1987
- A.J. Bayless Markets, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
- Obersteiner v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
- Tyree v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
- Div. of Finance v. Industrial Com'nCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.