Legal Opinion

Artis v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 8, 1990No. 2 CA-IC 89-0035PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FERNANDEZ, Chief Judge.

The only issue presented in this review of an industrial commission award is the administrative law judge’s (AU) refusal to issue subpoenas to permit the claimant to cross-examine all the doctors who signed a group medical report unless the claimant paid both the transcript and medical appearance expenses. We find that condition effectively denied the claimant her right of cross-examination and set the award aside.

The claimant was an assembly line worker who was injured in January 1987 when a heavy box fell on her left foot. Her claim for workers’ compensation…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jones v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  2. Cash v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  3. Young v. Hodgman & Mac VicarArizona Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Scheytt v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZ.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  5. Obersteiner v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Priest v. United Parcel ServiceCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997
  2. Martis v. cienega/copperpointCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API