Legal Opinion

Ross v. Industrial Commission

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1957No. 6386PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Chief Justice.

Petitioner, Elbert Ross, obtained, ex parte, a writ of certiorari to review an award of respondent Industrial Commission of Arizona, denying him compensation. Respondent promptly filed a motion to quash the writ and dismiss the petition for lack of jurisdiction. Ordinarily we do not write opinions in disposing of motions, but where, as here, a jurisdictional question is raised that becomes determinative of the whole matter, it would seem we should depart from the custom normally followed.

The facts giving rise to the instant proceeding are as follows: petitioner Ross…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. v. MatlockSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  2. Alexander v. State Personnel Bd. of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1943
  3. State v. PhelpsArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Sweitzer v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Beach v. Superior Court of Apache CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1946

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Wammack v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Stephens v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  3. Ross v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Knape v. BrownArizona Supreme Court · 1959
  5. State Ex Rel. Church v. Arizona Corp. CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1963

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API