Legal Opinion

Taylor v. State

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 2012No. 20090771PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice PARRISH,

opinion of the Court:

INTRODUCTION

T1 In this appeal we decide whether the district court correctly granted the State's motion to dismiss Von Lester Taylor's second petition for post-conviction relief The district court held that all of Taylor's claims1 were procedurally barred under the Post-Conviction Remedies Act (PCRA) because they were raised, or could have been, but were not, raised in a prior proceeding. Because Taylor has failed to establish that his claims could not have been raised in a prior proceeding and has failed to meet any statutory or common law exceptions to…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Sheppard v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Winward v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State v. HutchingsUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  3. State v. AlexanderUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Carter v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Gregg v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2012

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API