Legal Opinion
Original Creatine Patent Co. v. Met-Rx USA, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided May 3, 2005No. Civ.A. 204CV759PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
This matter comes before the court on the motion of the defendant, MeNRx USA, Inc. d/b/a/ Met-Rx Engineered Nutrition (“MeNRx”), to transfer this action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). For the reasons set forth herein, the defendant’s motion to transfer is GRANTED.
I. Factual and Procedural History
The plaintiff, The Original Creatine Patent Company, Ltd. (“OCPC”), filed a complaint on December 20, 2004, seeking relief for the defendant’s alleged willful induced patent…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Continental Grain Co. v. Barge FBL-585Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Koh v. Microtek International, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2003
- Cognitronics Imaging Systems, Inc. v. Recognition Research Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In Re Apple, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. Rambus, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2005
- PRAGMATUS AV, LLC v. Facebook, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2011
- Cincinnati Ins. Co. v. O'LEARY PAINT CO., INC.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2009
- Bartronics, Inc. v. Power-One, Inc.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.