Legal Opinion
Koh v. Microtek International, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided March 5, 2003No. CIV.A. 3:02CV191PublishedCited by 109 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PAYNE, District Judge.
BACKGROUND
The plaintiffs, Franklin C. Koh and Francis H. Koh (collectively, the “Kohs”), own U.S. Patent No. 6,166,830 (the “ ’830 patent”) entitled “Integrated Scan-to Store Apparatus,” which discloses an electronic stand-alone scanner that scans images and stores them to a removable storage device. Francis H. Koh is a lawyer and is representing himself and Franklin C. Koh. The Kohs have filed a Fourth Amended Complaint against Microtek Lab, Inc. (“MLI”), Microtek International Development Systems Division, Inc. (“MIDSDI”), Micro Electronics, Inc.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Board of Trustees, Sheet Metal Workers National Fund v. Baylor Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1988
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by109 opinions
- D2L LTD. v. Blackboard, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2009
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. Rambus, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2005
- Byerson v. Equifax Information Services, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2006
- JTH Tax, Inc. v. LeeDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2007
- Symbology Innovations, LLC v. Lego Sys., Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2017
104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.