Legal Opinion

Durst v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 20, 1963No. Civ. 27736PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFox, P. J.

Petitioner seeks a writ of prohibition to prohibit his examination by a medical expert ordered by the court upon its own motion under section 1871 of the Code of Civil Procedure, unless the petitioner is permitted to have his counsel and a court reporter present at such examination.

Petitioner, an attorney, commenced several actions against various insurance companies seeking to recover under per sonal disability provisions of their policies. We are concerned here only with his action against Washington National Insurance Company, the real party in interest in the instant case, by which…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sharff v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Gonzi v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Kelley v. Smith & Oby Co.Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1954

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In Re SpencerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  2. United States v. Ronald Thomas BohleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
  3. Tomlin v. HolecekDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1993
  4. Edwards v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Abdulwali v. Washington Metro Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API