Legal Opinion

In Re Spencer

California Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1965No. Crim. 8119PublishedCited by 161 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTobriner, J.

We adjudicate petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus which arises from his conviction of first degree murder and armed robbery. The jury fixed the penalty at death. We affirmed the judgment. (People v. Spencer (1963) 60 Cal.2d 64 [31 Cal.Rptr. 782, 383 P.2d 134], cert. den. (1964) 377 U.S. 1007 [84 S.Ct. 1924, 12 L.Ed.2d 1055].)

We set forth the bases for our conclusion that the admission of defendant’s statements to the police in contravention of his constitutional right to counsel did not cause sufficient prejudice to require reversal. We also give our reasons for *403deciding…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by161 opinions

  1. People v. BalderasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. People v. MurtishawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  3. People v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  4. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  5. People v. LedesmaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006

156 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API