Kelley v. Smith & Oby Co.
Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By MATIA and THOMAS, JJ.
Should the court, as defendant moves, require the plaintiff to submit to a psychiatric and neurological examination by Dr. Jay B. Cohn, from which examination plaintiff’s counsel and all other persons are excluded?
The inherent power of an Ohio trial court to compel a plaintiff in a personal injury action to submit to a physical examination is generally defined by the Supreme Court in S. S. Kresge Co. v. Trester, 123 Oh St 383. The first two paragraphs of the syllabus read:
“1. In an action for damages for personal injuries, the trial court has the power to…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Tomlin v. HolecekDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1993
- Simon v. CastilleLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
- Durst v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Haynes v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Pedro v. GlennCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.