Legal Opinion

Kelley v. Smith & Oby Co.

Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court

Decided October 28, 1954No. 635,817PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By MATIA and THOMAS, JJ.

Should the court, as defendant moves, require the plaintiff to submit to a psychiatric and neurological examination by Dr. Jay B. Cohn, from which examination plaintiff’s counsel and all other persons are excluded?

The inherent power of an Ohio trial court to compel a plaintiff in a personal injury action to submit to a physical examination is generally defined by the Supreme Court in S. S. Kresge Co. v. Trester, 123 Oh St 383. The first two paragraphs of the syllabus read:

“1. In an action for damages for personal injuries, the trial court has the power to…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Tomlin v. HolecekDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1993
  2. Simon v. CastilleLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. Durst v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Haynes v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  5. Pedro v. GlennCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API