Legal Opinion

Malsby v. Shipp

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 11, 1933No. 9328PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

1. All parties who are interested in sustaining the judgment of the court below, or who would be affected by a judgment of reversal, are indispensable parties in the Supreme Court, and must be made parties to the bill of exceptions, or the writ of error will be dismissed. Civil Code (1910), § 6176; Emanuel Farm Co. v. Batts, 176 Ga. 552 (168 S. E. 316).

2. Where an action is instituted seeking substantial relief against several defendants, and one of them files a demurrer which goes to the substance of the whole petition and challenges the plaintiff’s right to any relief, a *55judgment sustaining…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Emanuel Farm Co. v. BattsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
  2. Teasley v. CordellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  3. Tillman v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
  4. Tillman v. GrooverCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
  5. Butler v. KendrickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Bailey v. ToddCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  2. Gilbert v. Tippens, superintendent of banksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  3. Dobbs v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  4. Moore v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  5. Daniel v. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1934

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API