Legal Opinion

Tillman v. Davis

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided August 17, 1917PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Fish, O. J.

1. Where an action is instituted, seeking substantial relief against several defendants, and some of them file a demurrer which goes to the substance of the whole petition and challenges the plaintiff’s right to any relief, such demurrer enures to the benefit of all the defendants. Tate v. Goode, 135 Ga. 738 (70 S. E. 571, 33 L. R. A. (N. S.) 310). Where the judge sustains such demurrer and enters an order dismissing the whole case, such dismissal enures to the benefit of all the defendants, and they become interested in sustaining the judgment; and if the plaintiff desires to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tate v. GoodeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  2. Davis v. WaltersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  3. United States Leather Co. v. First National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Malsby v. ShippSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
  2. Huey v. National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
  3. Benson v. LewisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
  4. Heath v. MillerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  5. Koch Co. v. AdairCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API