Legal Opinion
Marshall & Stearns Co. v. Deneen Bldg. Co.
California Supreme Court
Decided February 8, 1915No. S.F. No. 6269PublishedCited by 3 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
Plaintiff appeals from an order denying its motion for a new trial.
The action was one brought to foreclose a lien for materials furnished and used in the construction of a certain building in the city and county of Sail Francisco known as the Cornelia Hotel Apartments. The complaint alleged that J. A. Deneen and H. M. Deneen were the owners of the real property upon which the said building was constructed; that they contracted with the Deneen building Company to erect the building; and that the agreement upon which the materials were furnished was one made by and between the plaintiff and the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Herriman v. MenziesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Bell v. San Francisco Savings UnionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Bell v. StaackeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Estate of YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Johnson v. Phenix Ins. Co. of BrooklynCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Spruce v. WellmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Johnston v. City of San FernandoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Harvey v. City of HoltvilleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967