Legal Opinion

Johnston v. City of San Fernando

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 23, 1939No. Civ. 12271PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOD, J. —

Plaintiff commenced this action to recover damages for injuries which he suffered when an automobile in which he was riding collided with an automobile driven by defendant Ward. At a jury trial it was stipulated that at the time of the collision defendant Ward was an employee of defendant City of San Fernando engaged in the performance of his duties as such employee. The jury returned a verdict in favor of defendants and thereafter the trial court granted a motion for a new trial “on the grounds of insufficiency of evidence to sustain the verdict”. Defendants appeal from the order…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bradley v. RosenthalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Herriman v. MenziesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Myers v. Tranquility Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. Davison v. Diamond Match Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
  5. Electric Utilities Co. v. SmallpageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Continental Casualty Co. v. Phoenix Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
  2. People v. MerkourisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Wells Fargo & Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Barkett v. BrucatoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. Pacific Employers Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API