Mittleman Properties v. Bank of California
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.
Plaintiff brought this action to require defendant The Bank of California National Association to remove asbestos from the building that defendant leases from plaintiff. Plaintiff appeals from a summary judgment. 1 ORCP 47. We reverse.
Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue as to any material fact, and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Seeborg v. General Motors Corporation, 284 Or 695, 699, 588 P2d 1100 (1978). On review of the summary judgment, we review the record in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party and draw all reasonable…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Seeborg v. General Motors CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Timberline Equipment Co., Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Uihlein v. Albertson's, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Deerfield Commodities, Ltd. v. Nerco, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- Bixler v. First Nat. Bank of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Johnsen v. Mel-Ken Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- Bennett v. Farmers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- Ainslie v. SpolyarCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- Quackenbush v. Portland General Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- Weihl v. Asbestos Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.