Johnsen v. Mel-Ken Motors, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.
Plaintiff appeals from a summary judgment in favor of defendant on plaintiffs claims of intentional misrepresentation and unlawful employment practices. ORCP 47. Plaintiff argues that there are genuine issues of material fact on each claim that preclude summary judgment. We reverse.
“Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue as to any material fact, and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. On review of the summary judgment, we review the record in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party and draw all reasonable inferences in its favor.” Mittleman…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Webb v. ClarkOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Shockey v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Rice v. McAlisterOregon Supreme Court · 1974
- Mittleman Properties v. Bank of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- American Nat. Bank of Denver v. TonkinOregon Supreme Court · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Meade v. Cedarapids, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Bates v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 2014
- Alton v. Medtronic, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2013
- Doe v. Holy SeeDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2006
- Benson Tower Condominium Owners Ass'n v. Victaulic Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 2014
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.