Legal Opinion

Ainslie v. Spolyar

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 16, 1996No. 8912-07730; CA A82127PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, P. J.

Plaintiffs purchased limited partnership units in Classic Christmas Trees Associates (Classic), an Oregon limited partnership. Defendants allegedly sold the units or participated in or materially aided the sales. Plaintiffs now seek to rescind their purchases under ORS 59.115(2)(a) on the ground that the units were sold in violation of the Oregon Securities Law (the Law) or of a condition, limitation, or restriction imposed on registration under the Law. They appeal from a summary judgment in their favor, arguing that the trial court incorrectly calculated the amount of prejudgment interest.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Artman v. RayOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Simpson v. First Nat. BankOregon Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Ertsgaard v. BeardOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Prince v. BrydonOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Stoeger v. Burlington Northern RailroadOregon Supreme Court · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gladhart v. Oregon Vineyard Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  2. Ainslie v. First Interstate BankCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  3. Goddard v. Farmers Ins. Co. of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  4. Magee v. All Terrain Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  5. Wells Fargo & Co. v. Industrial Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API