Quackenbush v. Portland General Electric Co.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.
Plaintiffs 1 appeal from a summary judgment for defendants on their claims against Portland General Electric Company (PGE) and Asplundh Tree Expert Co. (Asplundh). We reverse in part.
A court shall grant summary judgment when there is no genuine issue as to any material fact, and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. On review of a summary judgment, we examine the record in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party and draw all reasonable inferences in its favor. Mittleman Properties v. Bank of California, 131 Or App 666, 668, 886 P2d 1061 (1994).
When the evidence…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Fazzolari v. Portland School District No. 1JOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- Wilson v. Portland General Electric CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- Sacher v. Bohemia, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1987
- Miller v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
- Mittleman Properties v. Bank of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Oregon Laborers-Employers Health & Welfare Trust Fund v. Philip Morris, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 1998
- Brown v. Boise Cascade Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- German v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- Groeneweg v. Jeld-Wen, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2023
- Groeneweg v. Jeld-Wen, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2020