Legal Opinion

Sackett v. Haeckel

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 22, 1957No. 37,041, 37,071PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Neíson, Justice.

Defendant Paul Horni appeals to the supreme court both from an order denying his motion for judgment in his favor on the issue of contributory negligence and for a new trial on the issue of damages alone and also from judgment entered in favor of defendant Ray L. Haeckel, special administrator of the estate of Grace Schafer.

An action was originally brought by Fenton E. Sackett, the driver of a tractor-trailer, for damages arising out of a collision between his truck and a Packard automobile owned by Paul Horni and driven by Grace Schafer. Grace Schafer later died due to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Frankle v. TwedtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  2. Jacobsen v. DaileySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  3. Hubenette v. OstbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  4. Lea v. GentryTennessee Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Weddle v. PhelanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Phelps v. BensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  2. Hale v. AdamsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
  3. Ford v. EtheridgeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Rahja v. CurrentSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  5. Raydel, Ltd. v. MedcalfeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API