Legal Opinion

Rahja v. Current

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 1, 1963No. 38,603PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rogosheske, Justice.

This is a personal injury action which arose as a result of an automobile’s striking a highway washout during the nighttime. The jury returned a verdict for defendant-driver. Plaintiff, a passenger and the owner of the automobile, appeals from a denial of her posttrial motions.

The essential problem is presented by plaintiff’s claim that a new trial should have been granted because of errors in the instructions to the jury.

Defendant, aged 70, a- retired service-station operator, is a neighbor of plaintiff, a widow aged 59. They reside at Hibbing. Plaintiff is an…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lestico v. KuehnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  2. Hubenette v. OstbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  3. Rutz v. IaconoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  4. Daly v. SpringerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  5. Sackett v. HaeckelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Miller v. AlveyIndiana Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Tanski v. JacksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  3. Herman v. SpieglerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Holten v. ParkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  5. Hueper v. GoodrichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API