Legal Opinion

Rasp v. City of Omaha

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1925No. 24659PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The question involved in this case is the validity of certain bonds issued by the city of Omaha to pay damages assessed in proceedings in eminent domain for the condemnation of certain lands for parkways outside the corporate limits of the city. The action is to enjoin the sale of the bonds, and, the injunction having been denied a,nd case dismissed by the district court, plaintiff appeals.

Our decision rests upon the proper construction of two sections of the charter of metropolitan cities, the relevant portions of which are as follows:

“The city council may purchase or acquire by the exercise…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. Village of DetroitSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  2. North v. McMahanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. Blakey v. City CouncilSupreme Court of Alabama · 1905

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Anselmi v. City of Rock SpringsWyoming Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Department of Industrial Relations v. Little Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  3. Piper v. WillcutsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
  4. Piper v. WillcutsDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API