Legal Opinion
Piper v. Willcuts
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided April 11, 1933No. 9533PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAN VALKENBURGH, Circuit Judge.
The facts in issue in this appeal, as in the trial court, are thus succinctly stated by the trial judge:
“Prom the stipulation of facts it appears that Mr. Piper, the plaintiff, purchased 300 shares of the capital stock of the Minneapolis Artificial Ice Rink, Inc., in the year'1924, for which he paid $30,000. He held this stock until 1927, when he sold it for $4.00. He therefore sustained a loss of $29,996, for which he was not compensated by insurance or otherwise. He did not acquire nor enter into a contract or option to acquire shares of the capital stock of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Burnet v. HarmelSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Irwin v. GavitSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Smythe v. FiskeSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Carbon Steel Co. v. LewellynSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Alexander v. KingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. PleasantsSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Pleasants v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1938
- Hartley v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934