Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Village of Detroit

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 3, 1901No. Nos. 12,540 — (33)PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Action in the district court for Becker county to enjoin defendant, village of Detroit, from issuing certain bonds for the purchase of an electric light plant. From an order, Searle, J., dissolving a temporary injunction granted ex parte by the court commissioner, plaintiffs appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

This action was brought to enjoin the municipal authorities of the village of Detroit from issuing certain bonds of the village. At the time of the commencement of the action plaintiffs obtained from the court commissioner, ex parte, a temporary injunction, which was dissolved by the district court on motion of defendants, and plaintiffs appeal.

The bonds threatened to be issued and negotiated by defendants were authorized by the voters of the village at a special election held on June 23, 1900, for the purpose of establishing and equipping an electric light plant. This action is founded on…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. SissonIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  2. City Council of Waycross v. YoumansSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State ex inf. Major v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
  2. Thompson v. SmithSupreme Court of Vermont · 1957
  3. State ex rel. Utah Savings & Trust Co. v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Allison v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Howard v. Independent School District No. 1Idaho Supreme Court · 1910

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API