Legal Opinion

McDougall v. O'Hara

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 19, 1954No. Civ. 15971PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooling, J.

This is a quiet title action in which the plaintiff-appellant was denied relief because of his prior unconscionable conduct.

Appellant, a concrete contractor in Mill Valley, California and the respondent, a bookkeeper and secretary by occupation, were good friends for many years. In July, 1947, appellant, told respondent that he owed a lot of bills around the town of San Rafael which amounted to • approximately $3,000. The Bank of America would not loan him any money so he wanted to borrow the money from respondent. She was willing to loan him that amount if she was given some security. As a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. DeGarmo v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Kemp v. EnemarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Katz v. KarlssonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. Howe v. BrockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Johnston v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Moriarty v. CarlsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  2. Quintero v. WeinkaufCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
  3. Strauss v. Cole (In re Mamtek US, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API