Kemp v. Enemark
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLennon, J.
The plaintiff in this action seeks the equitable relief of injunction to prevent the defendants from selling real property under an execution sale. The trial court denied the relief sought and this is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendants. The appeal comes here upon the judgment-roll alone.
The facts of the case as revealed by the record before us are substantially these: John D. Kemp, the husband of the plaintiff herein, entered into a contract with the Bank of San Jose "whereby it was agreed that the bank would lend to said Kemp the sum of two thousand five hundred dollars if…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ohio Electric Car Co. v. DuffetCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Shinn v. MacphersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Crittenden v. St. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- Riddell v. ShirleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1855
- Bishop v. HubbardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
3Cited by29 opinions
- United States v. Renee Hooper Michelle Ralph, Dana M. Hooper Paul William RalphCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Harris v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Carter v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Nelson v. Fernando Nelson & SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Laack v. DimmickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.