Johnston v. Murphy
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
BEASLY, J., pro tem.
This is an action begun December 31," 1914, on a promissory note given by defendant to plaintiff. The principal defense is that the note was secured by a mortgage and that the action should have been one of foreclosure.
The note was dated January 23, 1909. The alleged mortgage consists of a letter from the defendant to plaintiff, the body of which reads as follows: “I hereby certify that there is due to you the sum of four thousand dollars. Said sum is secured by a lien upon that certain land comprising 937 acres in the rancho Los Positos, being the same land conveyed to me…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Berkeley Bank of Savings & Trust Co. v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
3Cited by5 opinions
- DeGarmo v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Katz v. KarlssonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- McDougall v. O'HaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- DeGarmo v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Lederer v. MuirCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947